1995), the court analyzed whether a woman had a duty to protect her husband's grandchildren from a previous marriage from his pedophilic behavior. Simco Sales Service of Pennsylvania, 657 A.2d 983, 984 (Pa.Super.Ct. "As a general rule, a person is not liable for the criminal conduct of another in the absence of a special relationship imposing a pre-existing duty." Elbasher v. ![]() We find that the forgery was not a foreseeable event and Calex had no duty to prevent the forgery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |